By Emma Peterson. 

From major industry announcements and scholarship awards to emerging market trends and wildfire preparedness, these were the RCS articles that got the most clicks this August.  

August was a month of announcements here at The Coffee Shops®! For our team, we launched a new microsite (www.RoofersCoffeeShop.ca) designed specifically for the Canadian market. Similar to our U.K. microsite (www.RoofersCoffeeShop.uk), this site will not only bring together contractors in its dedicated region but also strengthen the global roofing community.  

In addition to our big announcement, our site saw a lot of announcements and quite a few of them made our August 2026 top article list. For example, one of our R-Club members, Excel Roofing and Siding, sent out an announcement of a name change to Excel Slate and Copper. This change was designed to “better reflect the company’s long-standing expertise in slate roofing, copper craftsmanship and historic home restoration.”  

Another example was the Roofing Alliance’s announcement about the 2026-2027 Melvin Kruger Scholarship. “A total of $59,000 was awarded for new scholarships with an additional $55,000 for 12 renewal scholarships.” 

And coming in first and second on our August 2026 top 10 article list were two announcements, both from industry associations. In second place was an article about the Colorado Roofing Association’s new advisory about wildlife code requirements. As for first place, that went to the he Metal Roofing Alliance (MRA) and the Metal Construction Association (MCA)’s announcement of the results of metal roofing market study conducted by FMI Consulting. 

The top 10 August articles 

10 - Excel Roofing and Siding becomes Excel Slate and Copper

9 - Why the most successful roofing contractors plan further ahead by John Kenney. 

8 - TPO or metal retrofit? Understanding the tradeoffs by The Coffee Shops® 

7 - When the economic signals don’t agree by John Kenney. 

6 - Becoming a ROOFEREE by Emma Peterson. 

5 - The secret to managing commercial roofing projects by Emma Peterson. 

4 - The Roofing Alliance announces 2026-2027 Melvin Kruger Scholarship recipients.

3 - Heavy-duty adhesives for every jobsite by The Coffee Shops®. 

2 - New advisory helps Colorado roofers prepare for wildfire code requirements by Alex Tolle. 

1 - New market survey forecasts strong growth, significant potential for residential metal roofing in U.S. 

In this CoatingsCoffeeShop™ Coffee Conversations, host Megan Ellsworth is joined by John Kenney from Cotney Consulting Group and Johnny Walker from APOC to examine market research into the profitability, challenges and opportunities shaping commercial roof restoration today. Drawing on insights from the APOC Roof Restoration Index and years of industry experience, the discussion examines how restoration is helping contractors address labor shortages, improve efficiency, create new business opportunities and deliver greater value to building owners. Watch this episode for some surprising numbers!

Register now!

By Emma Peterson. 

Industry veteran John Kenney explains how stronger connections between Canadian and American contractors can drive innovation, education and long-term industry growth. 

In our first-ever Roofing Road Trip® Canada edition, John Kenney and Karol Weyman discuss how the launch of RoofersCoffeeShop.ca will help build bonds between the Canadian and American roofing markets. John is the CEO of Cotney Consulting Group and a roofing veteran with decades of field experience. In his own words, “I started in the roofing industry more than four decades ago and working on the roof and learning the trade from the ground up. From there, I moved through estimating, project management operations and eventually executive leadership. Those experiences gave me a practical understanding of nearly every part of the roofing company.” 

And over the course of that storied career, John has experienced the value of collaboration between Canadian and American professionals firsthand:  

As my consulting and training work expanded, I began receiving more opportunities to work with contractors and manufacturers and also industry organizations like the Canadian Roofing Contractors Association (CRCA) throughout Canada. Working further north was a natural progression and I've learned just as much from the Canadian contractors as I hope they have learned from me as every market and every company offers a different perspective. 

It is experiences like John’s that the RoofersCoffeeShop.ca microsite aims to foster. Because when we all learn from each other, we all grow stronger. John shared some insights related to this, saying, “The roofing industry definitely becomes stronger when we take the time to learn from one another. The challenges contractors face don't stop at any kind of national borders or provincial borders, but each market does approach solving them differently based on their environments and cultures.”  

By building a space where contractors can build relationships with their peers in a different country, RoofersCoffeeShop.ca is helping share ideas and solutions that benefit everyone. In John’s words, “The more we openly share ideas, I think the stronger the entire industry becomes.” 

Check out the whole episode to learn more about how the launch of RoofersCoffeeShop.ca is fostering industry-growing relationships.

Restoration success starts with the right assessment.

Fluid-applied restoration has become an important option for extending roof service life, controlling capital costs and avoiding unnecessary tear-off. But one of the most important things contractors need to understand is that not every roof is a restoration candidate.

I’ve seen coatings used successfully for decades, and I’ve also seen them applied to roofs that should have been replaced. The difference usually comes down to what happened before anyone opened a bucket. Restoration begins with evaluating the roof, not selecting the coating.

A roof that is fundamentally sound, reasonably dry and still has serviceable components may be an excellent candidate for restoration. A roof with widespread moisture, deteriorated insulation, failing attachment or significant substrate damage usually tells a very different story. That distinction matters because a fluid-applied system can protect and extend an existing roof, but it cannot correct every underlying failure.

The first step should always be determining what condition the existing assembly is actually in. That means looking beyond the surface. A professional evaluation should consider membrane condition, seams, flashings, penetrations, drainage, previous repairs and areas showing signs of movement or deterioration. Moisture investigation may also be necessary because what appears acceptable on the surface may hide wet insulation or deck problems below. I've always believed that the most expensive coating job is the one installed over a roof that never should have been coated. 

Localized deficiencies do not automatically eliminate restoration. In many cases, damaged areas can be removed and repaired, wet insulation can be replaced where appropriate and vulnerable details can be reinforced before the restoration system is installed. That is very different from trying to coat over systemic failure. Contractors need to recognize when the roof has crossed that line.

If moisture is widespread, the insulation has lost its integrity, the deck is deteriorated or the existing roofing system is no longer securely attached, replacement may provide better long-term value. The same can be true when years of repairs have created incompatible materials and questionable substrates across large portions of the roof. There comes a point when continuing to repair yesterday's problems costs more than properly resetting the roof assembly.

Substrate compatibility is another area where experience matters. Coatings perform differently depending on what they are being applied over. Existing membranes, modified bitumen, built-up roofing, metal and previously coated surfaces each present different preparation and adhesion requirements. Contamination, oils, oxidation, loose surfacing and aged repair materials can all affect performance.

This is why adhesion testing, proper cleaning and manufacturer requirements should never be treated as paperwork exercises. They help determine whether the proposed system can actually perform on that roof. Surface preparation may be one of the least glamorous parts of restoration, but it is also one of the most important.

You cannot coat dirt and expect long-term adhesion. You cannot ignore deteriorated seams and expect the coating to repair them on its own. And you cannot simply cover up trapped moisture and assume the problem is gone. A successful restoration project is built in layers. Repairs come first. Details are reinforced where required. Substrates are prepared properly. Primers are used when the system calls for them. Reinforcement and coating thickness are installed according to the specified assembly. The finished coating may be what everyone sees, but the work beneath the surface is often what determines performance.

Contractors also have a responsibility to help owners understand the difference between restoration and replacement. Restoration should never be presented as the cheaper version of reroofing. It is a different strategy for a roof that meets the right conditions. When those conditions exist, restoration can provide excellent value while reducing disruption and preserving useful components of the existing assembly. When those conditions do not exist, replacement may be the more responsible recommendation.

I've told contractors for years that sometimes the best way to sell coatings is to tell a customer when not to use them. That builds credibility. Owners remember the contractor who was willing to recommend the right solution instead of the easiest sale.

Fluid-applied restoration has earned an important place in modern roofing, but its success depends on disciplined evaluation and proper system selection. Good restoration contractors don't begin by asking, “Which coating should we use?” They begin by asking, “Should this roof be restored at all?”

By Emma Peterson. 

The importance of strong estimating practices in managing risk, protecting profitability and setting projects up for success. 

Estimating is the foundation of roofing projects – without an accurate assessment of a project, and the costs related to it, it's difficult to expect a project to go smoothly. But making sure your estimate is accurate is also one of the most challenging parts of a roofing project. To learn about how you can level up your estimating skills, we hosted John Kenney of Cotney Consulting Group for an episode of Roofing Road Trips®. 

Across the decades he has spent in the roofing industry, John has seen quite a few professionals struggle to build estimates. He shared the most common issue he sees, saying, “Estimators are taught how to measure roofs, how to price materials, but not how to manage the most important items, which is assumptions, communicate scope and company margins.”  

Why is it important that an estimator is aware of and managing these more abstract factors? As one of the first parts of any project, estimating is also the first step in risk management. John explained, “Estimating is really a decision-making role, not the takeoff one we see it presented as. As an estimator, you are the first to think through the project and make decisions about what will be done. That is directly tied to profitability and the risk.”  

So, how do you ensure you or your estimator are ready to tackle managing risk during the estimating process? Get the right training. John described how he trains estimators to go beyond the measurements and into risk management:  

We help them with estimating with a focus on giving them the skills that they won’t get in the field. So we focus on planning, communication, accountability and problem solving. Our goal is to give these leaders confidence and structure so they're not reacting all day. They're actually managing proactively. 

And managing proactively? That’s what shifts your estimating from just measurements and math to risk management and decision-making. And by making that shift, your company will be set up for successful, smooth projects. 

Want to learn more about estimator’s roles in risk management? Listen to the rest of the podcast!

By Alex Tolle, The Coffee Shops®.

Explore education focused on everything from roof performance and evolving codes to building-envelope design and business management at this year's show.

Continuing education gives roofing professionals an opportunity to step away from daily demands and take a closer look at the systems, materials, requirements and economic forces shaping their work. At the Western Roofing Expo 2026, hosted by Western States Roofing Contractors Association, attendees can explore a broad seminar lineup designed to strengthen roofing knowledge, connect technical decisions to better-performing buildings and help them make better business deciscions. 

The program starts with the evolution of core roofing systems. Ken Klein will examine four decades of single-ply roofing, including changes in materials, attachment methods and detailing driven by jobsite experience. Trent Cotney and John Kenney will offer a wider industry perspective by tracing how roofing materials, craftsmanship, codes and technology have developed over time.

Fire resilience is another important focus. Marco Sieber and Maury Alpert will discuss roof coverings and underlayments that can help mitigate the effects of flame and embers in the wildland-urban interface. Building on that conversation, Jess Grandy will review developing ventilation regulations and fire-resistant vent options intended to help homeowners prepare their properties and meet applicable codes. 

Attendees can also deepen their understanding of moisture and climate-related performance. Phil Dregger will share findings from a three-year study involving water accumulation and wood decay below reflective roofing. Mindy Dahlquist will explore how snow retention, ventilation, roof geometry and material selection affect roof performance in cold and mixed climates across the western United States. 

Several sessions turn attention to design responsibilities and changing building requirements. Brian Chamberlain will clarify the differences between design expectations and manufacturers’ published warranty coverage. Matt Braun will examine emerging air-barrier requirements for reroofing and explain how air, moisture and thermal-control layers interact. Brian will also lead a session on roof-to-wall connections, addressing air leakage, wind resistance, product compatibility and trade coordination at one of the building envelope’s most important junctions.

In addition to the technically focused sessions, there are sessions that focus on business management. One such session will be taught by our President and CEO, Heidi J. Ellsworth! In the session, Roofing Trends That Matter, Heidi will share about the RoofersCoffeeShop 2025 Trends Report, which collected contractor survey data from more than 200 roofing professionals representing residential, commercial and mixed contractors of all sizes. Attendees of this presentation will "gain insight into how contractors are adapting through technology, digital marketing and operational changes" and get practical tips for using "marketing, technology and community involvement to build trust, increase visibility and strengthen long-term business stability."

Together, these seminars offer practical education for professionals working to improve installation, design, compliance and long-term roof performance. Select sessions also provide continuing education opportunities through the American Institute of Architects and the International Institute of Building Enclosure Consultants.

Learn more about the education available at the Western Roofing Expo 2026.

By John Kenney, Cotney Consulting Group. 

How roofing contractors should plan for slower growth, uneven demand and continued volatility.

If you are having trouble deciding what the economy is telling you right now, you are not alone. The signals do not agree. 

Total nonfarm payroll employment declined by 23,000 jobs in July, while construction added 22,000. The unemployment rate edged down to 4.1%, even as labor-force participation remained at 61.4%. The broader economy is still growing, but not rapidly. Real GDP increased at a 1.5% annual rate in the second quarter, down from 2.1% in the first quarter. 

National construction backlog still looks reasonably healthy, yet architecture billings remain weak. Some contractors are carrying significant amounts of work, while others are telling me their runway is getting noticeably shorter. Data centers and power-related construction continue to perform extremely well, while several traditional commercial and residential markets remain much softer. 

Depending on which number you look at, you can make a case that the economy is still growing, the labor market is weakening or construction is holding up better than other sectors. All three can be true at the same time. 

That is a difficult environment to plan around, but it does not make planning impossible. I do not believe the current data tells us a severe recession is inevitable. I also do not believe it gives roofing contractors much reason to assume everything will work itself out. 

The more prudent position is somewhere in between. For business planning, I would operate on the assumption of slower growth, increasingly uneven demand, continued cost volatility, and elevated policy risk, while maintaining sufficientliquidity and operating flexibility to handle a genuine downturn if several of these pressures converge. 

That may not be the most exciting forecast, but it may be the most useful one. 

The headline economy is not the contractor economy 

One of the biggest mistakes business owners can make is assuming national economic statistics describe what is happening inside their company. They do not. Roofing contractors do not operate at the national average. 

They operate within a specific geographic area, serve a particular customer base, operate in certain market sectors, and depend on specific general contractors, owners, manufacturers, and suppliers. That means two roofing companies located a hundred miles apart can experience completely different economies. 

One contractor may be heavily exposed to data centers, health care, power generation or public-sector work and have more opportunities than the company can reasonably pursue. Another may depend heavily on retail, traditional office, private development or residential construction and find projects moving slower, owners hesitating, and competition becoming much more aggressive. 

Both companies are operating in the same national economy. They are simply experiencing different versions of it. That distinction matters when preparing a business plan. 

The question should not simply be, “How is construction doing?” The better question is, “How are the markets we depend on doing?” 

Construction is splitting into different markets 

The current backlog numbers illustrate the problem. Associated Builders and Contractors reported national construction backlog at 8.8 months in June. On the surface, that appears healthy. Look deeper, and the story becomes more complicated. 

Contractors involved in data-center work reported a backlog of 11.0 months, compared with 8.5 months for contractors without data-center exposure. Earlier in the year, ABC also reported that backlog growth was concentrated among the largest contractors, while smaller revenue groups showed weaker year-over-year results. 

That tells me we do not have one construction market right now. We have several. Data centers remain extremely strong, power-related construction continues to attract significant investment, and certain infrastructure and institutional sectorsremain active. 

At the same time, parts of manufacturing, private commercial development, office construction, and residential activity remain under pressure. Strong markets are becoming even stronger, while weak markets are becoming even weaker. 

The national average sits somewhere between the two and may accurately describe neither. That is why roofing executives need to understand their own market mix much better than they understand the national average. 

Backlog may be sending the wrong signal 

I have always paid close attention to backlog. It is one of the most important forward-looking indicators for a roofing company, but backlog must be understood correctly. A contractor can have plenty of work under contract and still have a production problem developing. 

I believe there are really three kinds of backlog. Reported backlog is the work you have under contract. Executable backlog is the work you realistically expect to move into production during the period planned. Profitable backlog is executable work that still meets the company’s margin expectations. 

Those numbers are not always the same. A roofing contractor may have a large project under contract today that is not scheduled to reach the roofing scope for another six months. If financing, permitting, another trade or the general construction schedule pushes that project back another 90 days, the project technically remains in backlog. However, the crew that was supposed to start that roof in October still needs somewhere to work. 

That is the difference between reported backlog and executable backlog. 

In my work with roofing and specialty contractors, I generally consider a quality, executable backlog of six months or more a healthy operating position. When the backlog approaches three months, I want leadership to monitor the bidding pipeline, award timing, and project start dates very closely. When it approaches two months, I become concerned because a single project delay, a lost award or a customer financing issue can quickly create a production gap. 

That is not a published national industry standard. It is an operating benchmark developed from years of managing and advising roofing companies. 

Right now, I am hearing more concern from roofing contractors around the country about shorter backlog visibility, delayed starts, and work that does not feel as certain as it did several months ago. That field feedback deserves attention. 

A contractor with nine months of reported backlog but only four months of reliably executable work has a four-month problem, not a nine-month solution. 

Labor is weakening without becoming easy 

The labor market is sending another mixed signal. National hiring has slowed significantly. May and June payroll gains were revised lower, and total nonfarm employment declined in July. Labor-force participation has also fallen since the beginning of the year. 

Those are legitimate signs of a cooling labor market, but roofing contractors should not assume that means skilled people will suddenly become easy to find. They will not. 

A slower national economy may increase the number of people seeking work, but it does not automatically create experienced roofing estimators, project managers, superintendents, service technicians or foremen. Those skills take years to develop. 

Our industry is also dealing with a generational transition as experienced people retire and companies compete for a limited pool of proven talent. That creates another planning challenge. 

Contractors should be cautious about adding overhead simply because they expect future growth. They should be equally cautious about cutting experienced people too quickly because the economic headlines turn negative. Replacing a strong estimator or project manager twelve months from now may be much more difficult than retaining that person through a slower period. 

The forward pipeline deserves attention 

Backlog tells us what contractors already have. Architecture and design activity can tell us something about what may be coming. That is why I believe the Architecture Billings Index deserves attention. 

The June Architecture Billings Index came in at 47.3, remaining below the 50 level associated with growth. Architecture-firm backlog also declined from 6.6 months in the first quarter to 6.3 months in the second quarter. 

I would not use that information to predict a construction collapse. I would use it as another reason not to become complacent. Design work occurs well before construction, and when design activity remains weak for an extended period, it can eventually result in fewer projects reaching the bidding stage. 

That becomes particularly important as contractors begin developing their 2027 budgets. The work you are installing today was often designed and financed many months ago. The condition of the design pipeline today may tell us more about the opportunities available next year. 

Delays may matter more than cancellations 

There is another issue I believe contractors sometimes underestimate. Projects do not have to disappear to hurt your business. They only need to move. 

Contractor surveys this year have continued to show a significant number of projects postponed, scaled back or canceled. From an operational standpoint, a postponement can sometimes be nearly as disruptive as a cancellation. 

Imagine you have a $2 million roofing project scheduled to begin in October. The owner still intends to build it, the contract still exists, and the project remains in your backlog. But financing problems push the start into February. 

Your backlog report may barely change, while your October production schedule changes dramatically. Now you have crews without the work you expected, equipment sitting idle, overhead continuing, and cash flow shifting. Other jobs may need to be accelerated to fill the hole. 

That is why contractors need to talk with general contractors and owners about more than whether a project is still active. Ask whether the start date is still realistic. That conversation can be far more valuable than simply looking at the backlog report. 

Costs have not returned to normal 

A slowing economy would be easier to manage if costs were declining at the same time. That is not necessarily the environment contractors are operating in. 

July’s inflation reports are a good example of why the headlines can be misleading. Consumer prices rose only 0.1% in July, and the annual inflation rate eased slightly to 3.4%. Producer prices were flat overall for the month. That soundsencouraging, and it is, but it does not mean prices are falling. 

If inflation drops from 4% to 3%, that does not mean prices fell 1%. It means prices are still increasing, just at a slower rate than before. The same distinction matters on the producer side. Even with no overall increase in July, producer prices were still 4.7% higher than a year earlier. 

For construction, the picture was even more important. Construction input prices edged up 0.1% in July and remained 7.4% higher than a year earlier. A lower inflation rate can slow the erosion of margins, but it does not automatically restore them. 

Material prices remain elevated, insurance continues to pressure overhead and skilled labor costs remain high. Fuel and freight can change quickly and recent disruptions involving global refinery capacity and major shipping routes are another reminder that energy costs can move independently of the broader economic cycle. Financing also remains expensive compared with the environment contractors grew accustomed to years ago. 

That creates one of the more difficult combinations for any business. Slower growth reduces pricing power, higher costs squeeze margins, and shorter backlog increases the temptation to chase work. 

That is where discipline matters. The worst response to a weakening market can be filling the schedule with low-margin work simply because everyone is worried about keeping crews busy. 

Busy and profitable are not the same thing. That lesson becomes even more important when the market starts slowing. 

Build a plan that does not require you to be right 

This is the part I believe matters most as contractors prepare for 2027. The best business plan in an uncertain economy is not the one built around the most accurate forecast. It is the one that still works when the forecast is wrong. 

I would build next year’s plan around three scenarios. The base case assumes slower growth, uneven construction demand, and continued cost volatility. The upside case assumes financing improves, project starts accelerate, and demand begins broadening across more construction sectors. 

The downside case assumes several pressures converge at the same time: employment weakens further, financing becomes more difficult, project delays increase, the backlog declines, and cost pressures remain. 

I am not suggesting contractors build three separate companies or three completely different budgets. I am suggesting leadership understand what happens under each scenario. 

What happens to revenue and gross margin? How much backlog and cash do we need? When do we stop hiring or adjust overhead? Which capital expenditures can wait? Which investments continue regardless of conditions? At what point does declining executable backlog trigger a change in strategy? 

Those decisions are much easier to make today than when everyone is already under pressure. 

Liquidity is strategic flexibility 

Cash is sometimes treated as money simply sitting on the balance sheet. During uncertain markets, liquidity is much more valuable than that because it creates options. 

It allows a company to retain a strong employee through a temporary slowdown, purchase materials earlier when there is a legitimate financial advantage, absorb a delayed project, and pursue an opportunity when a competitor cannot. 

Most importantly, liquidity prevents desperation. Companies under financial pressure often make poor decisions because they run out of time. They bid projects they should not bid, accept margins they should not accept, borrow under unfavorable terms, delay necessary investments, and make personnel decisions based on what happens next week rather than where the company needs to be next year. 

Liquidity buys time, and time creates better decisions. 

Do not cut away your ability to grow 

Preparing for slower growth does not mean putting the company into recession mode. That would be another mistake. 

If conditions weaken, contractors should absolutely challenge overhead, delay unnecessary purchases, protect cash, review expenses, and improve collections. But there is a difference between eliminating waste and eliminating capacity. 

Your strongest estimator is capacity. Your best project manager is capacity. Your service department is capacity. Leadership development is capacity. Technology that improves estimating, project visibility, and job costing may also be capacity. 

A contractor can cut so deeply during a slowdown that the company survives the downturn but is unable to take advantage of the recovery. That is why I prefer flexibility over fear. 

Protect the capabilities that make the company stronger. Challenge the expenses that do not. 

What I would be doing going into 2027 

If I were sitting with a roofing contractor today, preparing next year’s business plan, I would begin with the executable backlog rather than the total backlog. 

I would review what is realistically scheduled at 30, 60, 90, 180, and 270 days, then stress-test it. What happens if one large project is delayed by 90 days? What happens if two projects move? Which customers represent the greatest concentration risk? Which jobs still depend on financing or other approvals? Which projects have aggressive margin assumptions? 

I would review the bid pipeline and hit rates. I would increase business development before backlog becomes critical rather than waiting until crews need work. I would watch collections and cash conversion closely, preserve available credit even if I did not expect to use it, challenge major capital expenditures, and protect strong people and productive operating capacity. 

Most importantly, I would establish clear trigger points for when the company changes course. If the executable backlog falls below a predetermined level, what actions are taken? If gross margin misses plan for two consecutive months, what gets reviewed? If accounts receivable starts to stretch, who owns the response? If major projects move, when does labor planning change? 

Those decisions should not be made for the first time during a crisis. The time to make them is now. 

Planning without pretending to know the future 

I do not believe roofing executives should plan as though a recession is inevitable. I also do not believe they should assume today’s economic pressures will work themselves out. 

The more prudent position lies between those two extremes. Build the company around a reasonable expectation of slower growth, increasingly uneven demand and continued cost volatility. Maintain enough liquidity and operating flexibility to withstand a genuine downturn if several pressures converge. 

At the same time, preserve enough capacity to take advantage of opportunity if conditions improve. 

The economic signals may continue to disagree. That does not mean leadership has to be uncertain. We do not need to know exactly what the economy will do next. We need to build roofing companies capable of succeeding under more than one outcome. 

That is not pessimism. It is responsible business planning. 

By John Kenney, Cotney Consulting Group.  

The strongest roofing contractors are the ones who see the problems coming and prepare accordingly. 

After more than 45 years in the roofing industry, I have learned that many project failures do not begin on site. They begin weeks earlier, when a decision was delayed, an order was not placed, access was not confirmed or information was not chased soon enough. 

By the time the issue becomes visible, the opportunity to manage it properly may already be gone. A material has not arrived, the planned area is not available, the client has changed the sequence, the site team is waiting, additional plant is required or a delivery must be rearranged. The business then moves into recovery mode; people work harder, calls become more urgent and costs begin to increase. 

The problem may appear to be today’s problem, but it was usually created by a lack of planning several weeks earlier. That is why planning is one of the most important operational disciplines a roofing contractor can develop. 

Planning is more than producing a programme. 

Most contractors have a project programme, but that does not necessarily mean they are planning effectively. 

A programme may show when work is expected to begin and finish, but true planning goes much further. It considers the sequence of activities, availability of labour, material lead times, access arrangements, plant requirements, approvals, temporary protection, coordination with other trades and the effect of weather on the work. 

A programme tells the team what should happen. Planning determines whether it can happen. 

A roofing project may be shown as starting on a particular date, but has the insulation been approved? Have the rooflights been ordered? Is the scaffolding complete? Are lifting arrangements confirmed? Has the client released the work area? Are the required operatives available? Has the substrate been inspected? Are the design details complete? 

If those questions have not been answered, the start date is only an intention. The most successful roofing contractors test the programme against reality. 

Materials should be managed before they become urgent 

Material planning has always been important, but delays, transport disruption, manufacturing constraints and changing product availability have made it even more critical. Not every material creates the same risk. Some products can be obtained locally with short notice, while others require technical approval, fabrication, colour selection, design input or scheduled manufacturing. The project team should understand that difference from the beginning. 

A standard roll of membrane should not be managed in the same way as a bespoke metal flashing, rooflight, tapered insulation scheme or specialist edge detail. Critical materials need to be identified during the handover and tracked separately. 

The contractor should know what information is required before each item can be released, who is responsible for providing it and when the order must be placed to protect the programme. Waiting until the material is needed is too late. 

Many procurement problems arise because the team assumes there is more time than there actually is. The contractor may be waiting for a technical submission, final dimensions, colour approval or client instruction and each delay shortens the available manufacturing window. 

By the time the order is finally released, the supplier is blamed for a lead time that should have been planned from the start. Planning does not eliminate every delay, but it gives the contractor more options. That alone has value.

Labour planning requires a wider view

Labour is often managed one week at a time — the company reviews which sites are active, which team is available and where the greatest pressure exists. That may be necessary for daily operations, but it is not enough for long-term control. 

Roofing contractors need to look several weeks ahead. They need to understand which projects are expected to start, which are likely to finish, where labour demand will peak and which jobs require specific skills or supervision. Without that wider view, one delayed project can disrupt the entire labour plan. 

A project that was expected to finish on Friday may continue for another two weeks, even though the same operatives have already been allocated to another site. The contractor then has to move people, delay a start, use unfamiliar labour or divide a team that should remain together. 

The result is usually lower productivity. 

Labour planning should also account for more than total numbers. The question is not simply how many operatives are available. The business needs to know which people are suitable for the work, who can supervise the project, who is familiar with the system and whether the planned team can achieve the output assumed in the tender. 

A team of six is not automatically more productive than a team of four. Too many people in a restricted area can reduce output rather than improve it. The correct labour plan depends on the project, sequence, access and available workface. That is why planning must begin with more than a headcount. 

Plant and access can control the entire project

Many roofing projects are delayed because plant and access are treated as secondary issues. 

They are not secondary. They often control whether the work can proceed at all. 

Scaffolding, hoists, cranes, telehandlers, mobile elevating work platforms, loading areas and material storage all affect productivity and programme. If the contractor does not confirm these arrangements early, the site team may arrive ready to work but unable to move materials to the roof. 

Additional handling is one of the most common forms of hidden labour loss. Materials are delivered to the wrong location, moved once for storage, moved again for access and moved a third time before installation. 

Each movement consumes labour and increases the risk of damage. The contractor may not notice the cost because it is spread across the project, but it is still there. 

Good planning asks practical questions before mobilisation. Where will materials be delivered? How will they reach the roof? How much storage is available? Which areas must remain clear? Who is responsible for booking plant? What happens if access is shared with another trade? Are there restrictions on delivery times? Will the same access arrangement be available throughout the project? 

These questions are operational, but they are also financial. Poor access planning quickly becomes a labour problem. 

Weather must be part of the plan 

Roofing will always be affected by weather. 

The challenge is not predicting every condition perfectly. The challenge is building enough flexibility into the plan to respond when conditions change. 

A realistic programme should consider the time of year, the type of roofing system, the sequence of stripping and covering, temporary protection and the consequences of leaving areas exposed. It should also consider which work can continue if the planned activity cannot proceed. 

Can prefabrication continue? Can materials be distributed? Can internal work be completed? Can another area be released? Can inspections or quality checks be brought forward? Contractors that plan alternatives lose less time. Those that plan only one sequence are more vulnerable. Weather delays become especially expensive when the business has already committed labour, plant and deliveries to one activity with no secondary plan. 

The most prepared contractors do not assume the weather will cooperate. They build options. 

Communication must happen before the problem 

One of the clearest signs of weak planning is late communication. 

The client is told about a delay after the date has already been missed. The supplier is contacted when the material is urgently required. The site team is informed of a sequence change after arriving on site. The commercial team hears about additional work after it has been completed. At that point, the conversation becomes more difficult. 

Early communication creates choices. Late communication creates explanations. A client may be willing to adjust the sequence if the issue is raised early enough. A supplier may be able to prioritise an order if given proper notice. A project manager may be able to move labour to another area if the team knows access will not be available. 

The earlier the information is shared, the more options remain. That does not mean communicating every minor concern as though it is a crisis. It means identifying issues with enough time to manage them professionally. 

Good communication is part of planning because it gives the entire project team time to respond. 

Cash flow is affected by operational planning. 

Planning is not limited to site performance. It also affects cash flow. Materials may require deposits or early payment. Labour costs begin before the contractor receives payment. Plant hire continues even when work is delayed. Late variations may not be included in the next payment application. 

An operationally disorganised project often becomes financially disorganised as well. The business may carry more cost than expected because procurement happened too early or too late. It may miss valuation opportunities because additional work was not recorded promptly. It may continue paying for labour and plant while waiting for access or information. 

The project manager and commercial team should therefore plan together. What costs will be incurred before the next payment cycle? Which materials require early commitment? What information is needed to support the application? Which variations must be valued now? Are delays affecting cost recovery? 

Operational decisions create financial consequences. The strongest contractors understand that connection. 

Short planning meetings can create long-term control 

Planning does not require endless meetings. It requires disciplined conversations held regularly. 

A weekly planning review can identify upcoming risks before they become urgent. The team should look beyond the current week and ask what must happen over the next three, six or even 12 weeks.

 Which projects are starting? Which are finishing? Which materials are critical? Which approvals are outstanding? Where will labour demand increase? What plant must be booked? Which clients need updated information? Which commercial issues require action? 

The purpose is not to create a perfect forecast. Construction changes too quickly for that. The purpose is to keep the business looking ahead. A contractor that reviews only what happened last week is managing history. A contractor that reviews what must happen next month is managing operations. 

Both are necessary, but only one protects the future. 

Planning further ahead protects margin 

Many contractors associate margin loss with poor estimating. Sometimes the estimate is the problem. 

Often, however, the estimate was reasonable, and the delivery process allowed small inefficiencies to accumulate. Additional carriage is paid, plant is extended, labour waits, materials are handled repeatedly, work is completed out of sequence, supervision is required for longer than planned and variations are submitted late. 

None of these costs may be large enough to attract immediate attention, but together they reduce profitability. Planning protects margin by reducing avoidable disruption. It allows the contractor to order more strategically, schedule labour more accurately, coordinate plant properly and communicate changes before they become emergencies. 

The business becomes less reactive. That is the real advantage. 

Better planning creates a more predictable business 

Roofing contractors cannot control every event that affects a project. They cannot control the weather, manufacturing capacity, client decisions or every condition found on site. They can control how early they look for risk, how quickly they respond, whether responsibilities are clear and whether important information is reviewed every week or left until someone remembers it. 

The most successful roofing contractors are not those that avoid every problem. They are the ones that give themselves more time to manage problems properly. They plan materials before they become urgent, plan labour before teams become overcommitted, confirm access before operatives arrive, communicate before dates are missed and review commercial issues before costs are forgotten. 

Planning further ahead does not make roofing predictable in every detail. It makes the business more prepared. That preparation improves productivity, communication, cash flow and margin. It also gives the contractor something every business needs. 

More control over what happens next. 

Learn more about Cotney Consulting Group in their Coffee Shop Directory or visit www.cotneyconsulting.com.

About the author 

John Kenney has more than 45 years of experience in the roofing industry. His career has included every level of roofing operations, from field installation and estimating through executive leadership. He is the CEO of Cotney Consulting Group, a partner member of the International Federation for the Roofing Trades. He has earned the MIoR designation from the former Institute of Roofing in the United Kingdom. He works with roofing contractors to improve estimating, project management, operational performance, leadership and profitability. 

By Emma Peterson. 

Explore the articles that generated the most interest this month. 

In the last month, over 250 articles have been published on RoofersCoffeeShop.com. That’s a lot of reading to keep up with, especially for busy contractors who are going between the office and the field. To make it easier to keep up, we’ve looked at those hundreds of articles and picked out the most popular ones to showcase.  

In this list, there are a couple of articles authored by Heidi J. Ellsworth, the president of The Coffee Shops™. In one article she highlights how the National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA) is expanding mental health support through suicide prevention training, made possible through a collaboration with LivingWorks. The other article dove into the importance of awards and recognition during the current artificial intelligence boom.  

Our friends over at Cotney Consulting Group also contributed a few articles on our top 10 list, including one about crystalline silica exposure and another about creating an operational preparedness plan to navigate the current global political environment.  

Our number one article of the month showcased FMI Corporation’s 2026 Q2 North America Construction and Engineering Outlook Report and was written by Emma Peterson, senior content developer for The Coffee Shops™. This was not the only article of Emma’s that made the list, as her articles about turning data into business strategies, taking on leadership roles and the development of the metal roof retrofit industry were also featured. 

July 2026’s top articles 

10 - Eagleview warns emergency managers: A below average hurricane season is not a safe season by Eagleview. 

9 - NRCA expands mental health support with free suicide prevention training by Heidi J. Ellsworth. 

8 - NRCA Gold Circle Awards: Why recognition matters more than ever in the age of AI by Heidi J. Ellsworth. 

7 - When global events reach the rooftop by John Kenney, Cotney Consulting Group. 

6 - Building the metal roof retrofit industry by Emma Peterson. 

5 - Finding opportunity in every position by Emma Peterson. 

4 - ARCA’s Lotería Night brings fun and connection to the roofing community by Alex Tolle. 

3 - Connecting the dots between data and strategy by Emma Peterson. 

2 - The silica citation nobody sees coming by Cotney Consulting Group. 

1 - Construction growth expected in the next year by Emma Peterson. 

By Emma Peterson. 

John Kenney shares why contractors with strong systems, clear workflows and documented processes will be best positioned to embrace new technologies.  

For many of us, robots seem like something from a science fiction movie – something that might be cool but is far from becoming a part of our reality. But with advancements in automation and technology, robotics are already beginning to influence the roofing industry. To learn how contractors can prepare their operations for emerging robot technology, we brought John Kenney of Cotney Consulting Group on for a Read Listen Watch® webinar. 

Looking to the future, John sees robotics as a tool that will be used for repetitive tasks, sharing, “I think you're going to be able to have a lot of things happen within your company that are repetitive tasks, that we can't find anybody that wants to do them anyways, like moving materials, loading trucks, setting things up, managing your inventory, etc.”  

Additionally, he predicts that they will eventually become advanced enough to collaborate with your service technicians, saying, “There is a future where robots could be a part of service workflows. It could be super helpful in situations where you don’t have a full visual of a roof and need to collect that data safely. A robot could go up there and record data so that your service crew knows they can safely climb on a roof to work.” 

Obviously, we have not developed this level of robotic technology yet, but with the advancement of technologies like artificial intelligence, it has started to feel increasingly inevitable. So, if robots are going to become a part of our industry in the future, how can you make sure your company is positioned to adapt to this change effectively? John argues that it all depends on your operational workflows being in order:  

You have to start documenting your workflows and you have to start figuring those out. Further, you need to develop an accountability chain. Most companies have an unclear accountability process and if robotic tools ever become a part of our industry, you're going to need to clean those up... It’s the companies with disciplined systems and strong operational clarity that have the flexibility to adapt with technology.  

This advice applies to more than just preparing for future robot coworkers. It’s also about helping your team operate more efficiently and profitably today. By having everything documented and in order, your company will be better positioned both today and wherever the future leads.  

Listen the RLW or Watch the recording on demand to learn more about robotics, roofing and preparing your company for the future.